Re: MySQL Gets Functions in Java - Enlightenment Please

On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:55, Paul Thomas wrote:
> On 22/12/2003 13:17 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > I think anything other than a single jvm would be too much of a
> > > performance hit.
> >
> > Ok, I tend to agree, so does anyone have any preferences for a protocol?
> > RMI, RPC, XML-RPC ? Anything better?
>
> My instinct would be to go with something fast and lightweight.
No question, this doesn't have to be a fully featured thing, so I'm
soliciting suggestions?
>
> > > On platforms built with GCC3.2+, GCJ might be an alternative.
> > There are numerous issues with classpath stuff with GCJ, but I'm
> > certainly willing to look at it.
>
> Yes, it has its problems I agree. And it would only be available on a
> small subset of all the platforms on which PostgreSQL runs. But it would
> eliminate the need for a jvm which is why I suggested it. Swings and
> roundabouts I suppose.
>
>