Обсуждение: Clean up build warnings of plperl with clang-12+
Hi all, This is a follow-up of the discussion that happened here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/YYoJYO475dsqYhta@paquier.xyz Recently, we are getting warnings in the build of plperl when using at least clang-12 because of their new flag -Wcompound-token-split-by-macro, all the warnings coming from Perl itself. Upstream has posted a fix about that but it will take time before this propagates across the buildfarm (five~ animals are now impacted?): https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.changes/2021/07/msg57758.html dangomushi is impacted by that, and I'd like to stick an -Werror in it as it is proving to be good in detecting incorrect placeholders. Tom has suggested that we could add -Wno-compound-token-split-by-macro to take care of the issue on our side, and attached is a patch to do so. Any objections? I'd like to get this back-patched. Thanks, -- Michael
Вложения
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:35:21AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Tom has suggested that we could add -Wno-compound-token-split-by-macro > to take care of the issue on our side, and attached is a patch to do > so. > > Any objections? I'd like to get this back-patched. Backpatched this one as of 9ff47ea. That should allow the addition of -Werror on dangomushi. -- Michael
Вложения
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Backpatched this one as of 9ff47ea. That should allow the addition of
> -Werror on dangomushi.
Cool. I have also enabled -Werror on florican.
regards, tom lane
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Backpatched this one as of 9ff47ea. That should allow the addition of
> -Werror on dangomushi.
I see you tried to do that by adding -Werror to CPPFLAGS. That doesn't
work because it breaks configure's tests. (I wonder if meson is any
smarter than autoconf about that.) The way I do it on my own
animals is like
if ($branch eq 'HEAD' or $branch ge 'REL9_3')
{
# Add -Werror so we get errors for warning conditions.
# Pre-9.3 PG doesn't compile cleanly with Sierra's cc.
# Can't put this in CFLAGS because it breaks configure,
# so use COPT instead.
$conf{build_env}{COPT} = "-Werror";
}
Guess I could drop the branch check now.
regards, tom lane
On 11/11/21 13:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> Backpatched this one as of 9ff47ea. That should allow the addition of
>> -Werror on dangomushi.
> I see you tried to do that by adding -Werror to CPPFLAGS. That doesn't
> work because it breaks configure's tests. (I wonder if meson is any
> smarter than autoconf about that.) The way I do it on my own
> animals is like
>
> if ($branch eq 'HEAD' or $branch ge 'REL9_3')
> {
> # Add -Werror so we get errors for warning conditions.
> # Pre-9.3 PG doesn't compile cleanly with Sierra's cc.
> # Can't put this in CFLAGS because it breaks configure,
> # so use COPT instead.
> $conf{build_env}{COPT} = "-Werror";
> }
>
> Guess I could drop the branch check now.
>
>
Wouldn't it be better in any case just to add the clang fix for building
plperl rather than globally?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Wouldn't it be better in any case just to add the clang fix for building
> plperl rather than globally?
That'd be considerably messier wouldn't it? (And I wonder if the
meson system will be able to do it at all.) If you feel motivated
to make that happen, go for it, but I don't.
regards, tom lane
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:18:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I see you tried to do that by adding -Werror to CPPFLAGS. That doesn't
> work because it breaks configure's tests. (I wonder if meson is any
> smarter than autoconf about that.) The way I do it on my own
> animals is like
Nya. (Japanized Meh)
> if ($branch eq 'HEAD' or $branch ge 'REL9_3')
> {
> # Add -Werror so we get errors for warning conditions.
> # Pre-9.3 PG doesn't compile cleanly with Sierra's cc.
> # Can't put this in CFLAGS because it breaks configure,
> # so use COPT instead.
> $conf{build_env}{COPT} = "-Werror";
> }
>
> Guess I could drop the branch check now.
Thanks. I'll switch to something like that.
--
Michael
Вложения
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 03:51:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > That'd be considerably messier wouldn't it? Yes, that would be a bit messier. For example, we could do that with something saved in Makefile.global.in by ./configure that plperl feeds on to add this extra CFLAGS in its own local Makefile. > (And I wonder if the > meson system will be able to do it at all.) If you feel motivated > to make that happen, go for it, but I don't. Neither am I. 9ff47ea is the least invasive solution, at least. -- Michael