Обсуждение: [URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

[URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package...

От
The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Due to an error on my part, I mistakenly packaged up the -CURRENT source
tree as being v6.4.1, vs the actual v6.4.1 source tree...

This has *just* been fixed as of two minutes ago...

For those running production environments, *please* download this new
package and rebuild :(

Sorry for the inconvience that this is going to cause most ppl...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org




Re: [HACKERS] [URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package...

От
Sascha Schumann
Дата:
On Thu, 24 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> 
> Due to an error on my part, I mistakenly packaged up the -CURRENT source
> tree as being v6.4.1, vs the actual v6.4.1 source tree...
> 
> This has *just* been fixed as of two minutes ago...
> 
> For those running production environments, *please* download this new
> package and rebuild :(

Are there any big flaws in it which could result in data loss? I ran some
updates just yesterday with the what-I-thought-would-be 6.4.1. 
           Regards,
                                    Sascha Schumann |                                         Consultant | finger
sas@schell.de                                                   | for PGP public key
 



Re: [HACKERS] [URGENT] v6.4.1 was a mis-package...

От
Bruce Momjian
Дата:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Due to an error on my part, I mistakenly packaged up the -CURRENT source
> > tree as being v6.4.1, vs the actual v6.4.1 source tree...
> > 
> > This has *just* been fixed as of two minutes ago...
> > 
> > For those running production environments, *please* download this new
> > package and rebuild :(
> 
> Are there any big flaws in it which could result in data loss? I ran some
> updates just yesterday with the what-I-thought-would-be 6.4.1. 

Good question.  We have some new stuff in 6.5 tree, and none of it
tested.  The only thing that I think could be a problem is Vadim's
changes to the structure of the row headers.  This could majorly break
things internally.

The big problem is that the data rows were created with a different
format than the backend expected.  At least that is my conclusion based
on what Vadim had done.

A dump/restore should may fix any breakage, but you may have to restore
and re-run the updates.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026