> On Thu, 24 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >
> > Due to an error on my part, I mistakenly packaged up the -CURRENT source
> > tree as being v6.4.1, vs the actual v6.4.1 source tree...
> >
> > This has *just* been fixed as of two minutes ago...
> >
> > For those running production environments, *please* download this new
> > package and rebuild :(
>
> Are there any big flaws in it which could result in data loss? I ran some
> updates just yesterday with the what-I-thought-would-be 6.4.1.
Good question. We have some new stuff in 6.5 tree, and none of it
tested. The only thing that I think could be a problem is Vadim's
changes to the structure of the row headers. This could majorly break
things internally.
The big problem is that the data rows were created with a different
format than the backend expected. At least that is my conclusion based
on what Vadim had done.
A dump/restore should may fix any breakage, but you may have to restore
and re-run the updates.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026