Обсуждение: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

[OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

От
Ow Mun Heng
Дата:
I'm just wetting my hands with slony and during the setup of the slave,
I did and dump and restore of the master DB to the Slave DB.

However during the startup of slony, I noticed that it issues a truncate
command to the (to be) replicated table. Hence, this means that there's
no such need for me to do a dump/restore in the 1st place.

can someone confirm this? It _is_ taking long time (for slony) to do the
\copy (~60GB in multiple tables being replicated, including (on the fly)
index creation)

Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

От
Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:15:23AM +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> I'm just wetting my hands with slony and during the setup of the slave,
> I did and dump and restore of the master DB to the Slave DB.

Nope, you don't need to do that.  You need a copy of the _schema_ on the
target machine.  But slony will remove all the contents and build the
replica anew.

> can someone confirm this? It _is_ taking long time (for slony) to do the
> \copy (~60GB in multiple tables being replicated, including (on the fly)
> index creation)

It takes approximately the same time as it would to do a psql -h
[remotehost] -f dumpfile.sql restore (i.e. copying the entire data contents
across the network).

A


Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

От
Chris Browne
Дата:
ajs@crankycanuck.ca (Andrew Sullivan) writes:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:15:23AM +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
>> I'm just wetting my hands with slony and during the setup of the slave,
>> I did and dump and restore of the master DB to the Slave DB.
>
> Nope, you don't need to do that.  You need a copy of the _schema_ on the
> target machine.  But slony will remove all the contents and build the
> replica anew.

Right.  The argument for doing so is that this approach (TRUNCATE +
COPY on the subscriber) is the only way that Slony-I can be certain
that it has all data on the subscriber that was on the provider.

That way, it doesn't need to trust any dodgy claims that "oh, I copied
all the data - honest!"

>> can someone confirm this? It _is_ taking long time (for slony) to do the
>> \copy (~60GB in multiple tables being replicated, including (on the fly)
>> index creation)
>
> It takes approximately the same time as it would to do a psql -h
> [remotehost] -f dumpfile.sql restore (i.e. copying the entire data
> contents across the network).

In 1.2.x, it should be a little bit quicker than the "pg_dump | psql"
approach as all index generation takes place together for each table.

When you do a restore of a pg_dump, the indexes are generated in a
somewhat arbitrary order, where there may be a separation in time
between when different indexes on a given table get created.

In contrast, Slony-I regenerates all the indexes on a given table in a
"one swell foop" fashion, which might be expected to allow cacheing to
provide a bit better performance than you could get with "pg_dump |
psql".
--
"cbbrowne","@","cbbrowne.com"
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/emacs.html
Microsoft Outlook: Deploying Viruses Has Never Been This Easy!

Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

От
Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Chris Browne wrote:

> In contrast, Slony-I regenerates all the indexes on a given table in a
> "one swell foop" fashion, which might be expected to allow cacheing to
> provide a bit better performance than you could get with "pg_dump |
> psql".

I'm left wondering whether the swoop is actually fell.  I imagine most
people would not survive an elephant herd, or slony, turning fell.  Now,
swooping elephants must be an interesting sight.  If pigs can fly ...

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

От
Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:11:40PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> swooping elephants must be an interesting sight.  If pigs can fly ...

Is this what you had in mind?

http://www.amoeba.com/dynamic-images/blog/dumbo.gif

A

Re: [OT] Slony (initial) Replication - Slow

От
Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:11:40PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > swooping elephants must be an interesting sight.  If pigs can fly ...
>
> Is this what you had in mind?
>
> http://www.amoeba.com/dynamic-images/blog/dumbo.gif

Hmm, something like that, but Dumbo does not look truly "fell" ;-)

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.