Обсуждение: front end application

I've been playing with postgresql for a while now. I'm curious how
others develop front ends for pg. I have looked at using pgaccess, and
ReKall. Both seem pretty good.

I've also been playing with MS Access
and using the pgodbc drivers. I am using kerberized ssh access to the
linux box running pg8. If I used the odbc driver then I need to tunnel
that to pg -- and then I have to put up with the typical windows user
not reading the simple instructions to click on an icon to log into a
system -- and then I have to worry about what kind of shell to give to
a user if they are only using pg.

On the other hand, if I develop in pgaccess or ReKall then I have them
shell into the linux box and actually make 'that' there shell -- but
then I have to tunnel X.

It doesn't seem like nirvana -- and it is not as 'seamless' as using
the product from Redmond that shall not be named.

So, I am very interested in what others are using to build a good ui
for a pg application. Any comments?

--
David Bear
phone:     480-965-8257
fax:     480-965-9189
College of Public Programs/ASU
Wilson Hall 232
Tempe, AZ 85287-0803
 "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing"

I've heard good things about using Access as a front-end to PostgreSQL.
Haven't done it myself, though.

Have you considered using SSL to secure your communications? There are
programs out there for windows that make it pretty easy to tunnel a
connection via SSL, so this would probably be better than using SSH.
Then you can just let PostgreSQL handle user authentication.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:11:02AM -0700, David Bear wrote:
> I've been playing with postgresql for a while now. I'm curious how
> others develop front ends for pg. I have looked at using pgaccess, and
> ReKall. Both seem pretty good.
>
> I've also been playing with MS Access
> and using the pgodbc drivers. I am using kerberized ssh access to the
> linux box running pg8. If I used the odbc driver then I need to tunnel
> that to pg -- and then I have to put up with the typical windows user
> not reading the simple instructions to click on an icon to log into a
> system -- and then I have to worry about what kind of shell to give to
> a user if they are only using pg.
>
> On the other hand, if I develop in pgaccess or ReKall then I have them
> shell into the linux box and actually make 'that' there shell -- but
> then I have to tunnel X.
>
> It doesn't seem like nirvana -- and it is not as 'seamless' as using
> the product from Redmond that shall not be named.
>
> So, I am very interested in what others are using to build a good ui
> for a pg application. Any comments?
>
> --
> David Bear
> phone:     480-965-8257
> fax:     480-965-9189
> College of Public Programs/ASU
> Wilson Hall 232
> Tempe, AZ 85287-0803
>  "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing"
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

Hi David,

We've been using and are very happy with Python (using wxwidgets as a
gui) and pypgsql to provide db access to pg. It means our Mac osx
machines, windoze and linux boxes all share the same program. Very nice.

Regards and good luck
    Walter Kaan

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 10:11 -0700, David Bear wrote:
> I've been playing with postgresql for a while now. I'm curious how
> others develop front ends for pg. I have looked at using pgaccess, and
> ReKall. Both seem pretty good.
>
> I've also been playing with MS Access
> and using the pgodbc drivers. I am using kerberized ssh access to the
> linux box running pg8. If I used the odbc driver then I need to tunnel
> that to pg -- and then I have to put up with the typical windows user
> not reading the simple instructions to click on an icon to log into a
> system -- and then I have to worry about what kind of shell to give to
> a user if they are only using pg.
>
> On the other hand, if I develop in pgaccess or ReKall then I have them
> shell into the linux box and actually make 'that' there shell -- but
> then I have to tunnel X.
>
> It doesn't seem like nirvana -- and it is not as 'seamless' as using
> the product from Redmond that shall not be named.
>
> So, I am very interested in what others are using to build a good ui
> for a pg application. Any comments?
>