Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Дата
Msg-id w2ydcc563d11005041304ufc8ee23dy2e0873df298d2b5f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?  (Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at>)
Ответы Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?  (Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at>)
Список pgsql-admin
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 11:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Sabaini <peter.sabaini@ait.ac.at> writes:
>> > it seems Postgres tries to send a UDP packet to a random high port to
>> > communicate with the statistics collector daemon. We have rather strict
>> > packet filter rules in place, and I'd like to make the system use a
>> > fixed port for this, or even better a Unix domain socket. Is this
>> > possible (setting a compile time or run time parameter)?
>>
>> No, the stats collector just uses whatever port bind() chooses for it.
>
> A pity.
>
>> I'd suggest backing off your ideas about how much filtering is
>> appropriate for local connections.
>
> Since we're running multiple database instances with different projects
> on one machine I'd like to isolate them as best I can.

Maybe running them in individual VMs would do that.

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Sabaini
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Statistics collector port / unix dom. socket?