Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Steele
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver
Дата
Msg-id e5ab7783-89a4-45d9-ffd5-9e9117573c1d@pgmasters.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 7/24/17 3:28 PM, David Steele wrote:
> 
> Yes, and this is another behavioral change to consider -- one that is 
> more likely to impact users than the change to pg_stop_backup().  If 
> pg_basebackup is not currently waiting for WAL on a standby (but does on 
> a primary) then that's pretty serious.

My bad, before PG10 pg_basebackup did not check that WAL was archived on 
a primary *or* a standby unless the -x option was specified, as documented.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gilles Darold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Issue with circular references in VIEW
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreign table modification