On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I mean constraints derived from WITH CHECK OPTIONs specified for parent
> views. We use the words "WITH CHECK OPTION constraints" in comments in
> nodeModifyTable.c, so the expression "CHECK OPTION constrains" doesn't sound
> not that bad to me. (I used "CHECK OPTION", not "WITH CHECK OPTION",
> because we use "CHECK OPTION" a lot more in the documentation than "WITH
> CHECK OPTION".)
Yeah, it seems OK to me, too; if the consensus is otherwise, we also
have the option to change it later. Committed and back-patched as you
had it, but I removed a spurious comma.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company