Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hitoshi Harada
Тема Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties
Дата
Msg-id e08cc0400810280531k7c5eafafya6079774f7a138de@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Window Functions: v07 APIs and buffering strateties  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
2008/10/28 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com> writes:
>> 2008/10/28 ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>:
>>> I tested the patch on mingw (Windows) and
>>> got the following warning and error:
>>>
>>> A. gram.y: conflicts: 3 shift/reduce
>>> B. include/nodes/plannodes.h:650: error: syntax error before "uint"
>>>
>>> I have no idea about A.
>
>> I have noticed it but didn't think it is a problem, but it doesn't
>> occur in production, does it?
>
> We have a zero-tolerance policy for bison warnings.  Patches that
> introduce shift/reduce conflicts *will* be rejected.  (And no, %expect
> isn't an acceptable fix.  The problem with it is you can't be sure
> which warnings it ignored.  In a grammar that gets hacked on as often
> as PG's does, we couldn't rely on the conflicts to not move around,
> possibly resulting in unforeseen misbehavior.)
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

OK, I'll try to remove it. I'm not used to bison so my first task is
to find where the conflict is...

Regards,

-- 
Hitoshi Harada


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: VACUUMs and WAL
Следующее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal of PITR performance improvement for 8.4.