Re: pg_attribute size
| От | Scott Marlowe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_attribute size |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | dcc563d10910261627h4ec4b7b8y9409d36f6cdf9893@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_attribute size (Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_attribute size
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com> wrote: > We have several partitioned tables that get dropped every day ..We do > not do autovacuum as it is an IO hog (and most tables are dropped > anyways..and the large tables are never updated).. 1: autovac can be adjusted to use much less IO than regular vacuum. 2: You can tell it to ignore certain tables. > I however did a plain vacuum analyze and that fixed the problem with > tools(e.g pgadmin) that accessed the data dictionary and were very > slow before the vacuum. Huh. Is the pg_attribute size much smaller?
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: