Re: language cleanups in code and docs
От
David Steele
Тема
Re: language cleanups in code and docs
Дата
Msg-id
da62b20a-b483-6cd1-0c35-07fbfd4b4838@pgmasters.net
Ответ на
Re: language cleanups in code and docs (Andres Freund)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
language cleanups in code and docs Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Ashwin Agrawal <ashwinstar@gmail.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Re: language cleanups in code and docs Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
On 6/16/20 6:27 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2020-06-16 17:14:57 -0400, David Steele wrote: >> On 6/15/20 2:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > >>> 0008: docs: WIP multi-master rephrasing. >>> I like neither the new nor the old language much. I'd welcome input. >> >> Why not multi-primary? > > My understanding of primary is that there really can't be two things > that are primary in relation to each other. Well, I think the same is true for multi-master and that's pretty common. > active/active is probably > the most common term in use besides multi-master. Works for me and can always be updated later if we come up with something better. At least active-active will be easier to search for. >> One last thing -- are we considering back-patching any/all of this? > > I don't think there's a good reason to do so. I was thinking of back-patching pain but if you don't think that's an issue then I'm not worried about it. > Thanks for the look! You are welcome! -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления