On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:53:34AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:04 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> > > On 15 Jun 2020, at 20:22, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for picking this up!
> >
> > > 1) 'postmaster'. As changing that would be somewhat invasive, the word
> > > is a bit more ambiguous, and it's largely just internal, I've left
> > > this alone for now. I personally would rather see this renamed as
> > > supervisor, which'd imo actually would also be a lot more
> > > descriptive. I'm willing to do the work, but only if there's at least
> > > some agreement.
> >
> > FWIW, I've never really liked the name postmaster as I don't think it conveys
> > meaning. I support renaming to supervisor or a similar term.
>
> +1. Postmaster has always sounded like a mailer daemon or something,
> which we ain't.
Postmaster is historically confused with the postmaster email account:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmaster_(computing)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee