Virtualization vs. sharing a server
От | Ramiro Barreca |
---|---|
Тема | Virtualization vs. sharing a server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b1fec7231003290750n3326e86bs6521de808c7d504c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Virtualization vs. sharing a server
Re: Virtualization vs. sharing a server Re: Virtualization vs. sharing a server Re: Virtualization vs. sharing a server |
Список | pgsql-admin |
At this moment we are considering a plan for upgrading many servers in our datacenter.
As this is a very heterogeneous platform (from Oracle 10g, SQL Server 2008, Firebird 2.1, Mysql 5, Postgre 8.4 up to Informix 5 and even COBOL apps) whe are evaluating Virtualization or just sharing a server among PostgreSQL and firebird or MySQL.
As Virtualiaztion is almost discarded after reading many articles that locate this option in the "don'ts-list", we want to know your experience (if any) about installing a PostgreSQL and a Firebird server in the same Linux server.
Postgre is the DB that we are trying to migrate from Firebird, but this process will demand several months to conclude.
- Is there a configuration option we need to consider to share this server?
- What is the recomended hardware for a PostgreSQL server that has to support between 500 and 1000 simultaneous user connections? Is there a whitepaper about this?
Thanks in advance.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: