On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:08:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Well, I'm OK with this consensus on 1d35f705e if folks think this is
> useful enough for all the stable branches.
I have done that down to REL_15_STABLE for now as this is able to
apply cleanly there. Older branches have a lack of information here,
actually, because read_backup_label() does not return the TLI
retrieved from the start WAL segment, so we don't have the whole
package of information.
--
Michael