Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Дата
Msg-id ZbMiPvbEpexkqBVX@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Ответы Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:44:52PM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/25/24 17:42, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We're talking about 1d35f705e, right?  That certainly looks harmless
>> and potentially useful.  I'm +1 for back-patching.
>
> That's the one. If we were modifying existing messages I would be against
> it, but new, infrequent (but oh so helpful) messages seem fine.

Well, I'm OK with this consensus on 1d35f705e if folks think this is
useful enough for all the stable branches.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A performance issue with Memoize