On 1/28/24 20:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:08:46PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Well, I'm OK with this consensus on 1d35f705e if folks think this is
>> useful enough for all the stable branches.
>
> I have done that down to REL_15_STABLE for now as this is able to
> apply cleanly there. Older branches have a lack of information here,
> actually, because read_backup_label() does not return the TLI
> retrieved from the start WAL segment, so we don't have the whole
> package of information.
I took a pass at this on PG14 and things definitely look a lot different
back there. Not only is the timeline missing, but there are two sections
of code for ending a backup, one for standby backup and one for primary.
I'm satisfied with the back patches as they stand, unless anyone else
wants to have a look.
Regards,
-David