Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:03:19AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> I took a pass at this on PG14 and things definitely look a lot different
> back there. Not only is the timeline missing, but there are two sections of
> code for ending a backup, one for standby backup and one for primary.

Unfortunately.  The TLI from the start WAL segment lacking from these
APIs is really annoying especially if the backup_label is gone for
some reason..

> I'm satisfied with the back patches as they stand, unless anyone else wants
> to have a look.

Okay, thanks for double-checking!
--
Michael