On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:18:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 08:11:36AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > That said, I still think that the current wording should be tweak with respect
> > to row vs. rows (especially if we continue to call it a table):
> >
> > Current:
> > "The SET and WHERE clauses in ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE have access to the
> > existing row using the table's name (or an alias), and to [rows] proposed
> > for insertion using the special excluded table."
> >
> > Change [rows] to:
> >
> > "the row"
> >
> >
> > I'm undecided whether "FROM excluded" should be something that works - but I
> > also don't think it would actually be used in any case.
>
> I found two places where a singular "row" would be better, doc patch
> attached.
Patch applied to all supported versions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson