Re: Duplicate function call on timestamp2tm

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Li Japin
Тема Re: Duplicate function call on timestamp2tm
Дата
Msg-id SG2PR06MB3776DC04EA41E8FDC509B36CB6550@SG2PR06MB3776.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Duplicate function call on timestamp2tm  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Duplicate function call on timestamp2tm  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Thanks for your confirm. Is there anything I can do?

On Dec 12, 2019, at 11:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Ah, after looking in the git history, not quite that ancient:
this duplication dates to commit 258ee1b63, which moved these
switch cases from the "if (type == RESERV)" switches in the
same functions.  In the previous coding these function calls
were actually necessary, but here they're redundant.  I guess
that's just additional ammunition for Greg's point that the
keywords were misclassified ;-).

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Make autovacuum sort tables in descending order of xid_age
Следующее
От: Amit Khandekar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files