Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re:
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0302121912150.2811-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re:
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration (was Re: |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Tom Lane writes: > Well, as I commented later in that mail, I feel that 1000 buffers is > a reasonable choice --- but I have to admit that I have no hard data > to back up that feeling. I know you like it in that range, and 4 or 8 MB of buffers by default should not be a problem. But personally I think if the optimal buffer size does not depend on both the physical RAM you want to dedicate to PostgreSQL and the nature and size of the database, then we have achieved a medium revolution in computer science. ;-) -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: