Re: smart copy?
От | Nigel J. Andrews |
---|---|
Тема | Re: smart copy? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0204262244580.965-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: smart copy? ("Joel Burton" <joel@joelburton.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Joel Burton wrote: > > [edited some stuff out here] > > It's slower than running COPY, since you're executing > dozens/hundreds/kajillions of INSERT commands rather than one COPY command. > If that's a problem, you can reduce it a bit by dropping indexes and > triggers on B.TheTable, doing the INSERTs, then re-adding these. Ah, yes, the old dropping indexes etc. for loading data. I realise this is just about standard practice on more than just postgres but does it really make a difference? I ask this because I have recently (and am doing so again) reloading a large table with foriegn key constraints and indexes. I drop the table and recreate it with out the foriegn keys, thus killing the FK triggers and indexes. [Well actually I keep the primary key there]. Loading the data is fine. Sure it takes a while but then it takes a while to write out to file in the first place. However, when it comes to recreating the constraints and indexes it takes ages. The indexes took hours if I recall correctly. Has anyone actually done tests to confirm that load+index+constraint time is less that just a plain load with everything still enabled? Is the way pg_dump disables some of these things more efficient some how? I am obviously being a tad lazy here,I could run tests myself, but I'm currently restoring this table again and I'm thinking someone must have done this in the past anyway. -- Nigel J. Andrews Director --- Logictree Systems Limited Computer Consultants
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: