Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joel Burton
Тема Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0101221240490.3334-100000@olympus.scw.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Ответы Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:

> And this case can be handled within one database by having multiple
> schema, one for each package. It's not there yet, but it's a simpler
> solution than the generic solution. The problem (as others have mentioned)
> is that we don't want to open the door to remote access until we have a
> two-phase transaction commit mechanism in place. Doing it any other way
> is not a 'partial solution', it's a corrupt database waiting to happen.

What does '2-phase transaction commit mechanism' mean in this case?

-- 
Joel Burton   <jburton@scw.org>
Director of Information Systems, Support Center of Washington



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mitch Vincent"
Дата:
Сообщение: Beta 3 question(s)
Следующее
От: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: AW: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB (fwd)