> Good to learn PG, in fact, is faster than SAP DB. But how the figure 2.487 comes up? A single select statement or
somethingelse?
I think it was just a more-exact unsubstantiated claim.
Jon
>
> --------- Original Message ---------
>
> DATE: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:00:30
> From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
> To: Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>, vwu98034@lycos.com
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org,Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>
>
> >On Thursday 24 July 2003 04:42, Mike Mascari wrote:
> >> Vernon Smith wrote:
> >> > The unknown is only in North American, but not in Europe.
> >> > That is what I learnt more than a year ago. It has some
> >> > advantagess over PG from on-line information. It is
> >> > quicker than PG for one.
> >>
> >> No. PG is 2.5 times faster.
> >>
> >> See how easy it is for people to make unsubstantiated claims?
> >
> >Be fair Mike, it's actually 2.487 times faster
> >
> >Unsubstantiated claims should be implausibly accurate too ;-)
> >
> >--
> > Richard Huxton
> > Archonet Ltd
> >
> >---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> > joining column's datatypes do not match
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
> http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>