Good to learn PG, in fact, is faster than SAP DB. But how the figure 2.487 comes up? A single select statement or
somethingelse?
--------- Original Message ---------
DATE: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:00:30
From: Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>, vwu98034@lycos.com
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org,Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>
>On Thursday 24 July 2003 04:42, Mike Mascari wrote:
>> Vernon Smith wrote:
>> > The unknown is only in North American, but not in Europe.
>> > That is what I learnt more than a year ago. It has some
>> > advantagess over PG from on-line information. It is
>> > quicker than PG for one.
>>
>> No. PG is 2.5 times faster.
>>
>> See how easy it is for people to make unsubstantiated claims?
>
>Be fair Mike, it's actually 2.487 times faster
>
>Unsubstantiated claims should be implausibly accurate too ;-)
>
>--
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005