On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Kris Kiger wrote:
> Oleg,
>
> Thanks for the help on this.
>
> The query I used to return the 508 number is:
> SELECT * FROM stat('SELECT vector FROM product') ORDER BY ndoc
> desc, word ;
>
> Testing says, the more words I use, the faster the query is. My
> original search word, 'oil', appears in 226,357 documents 233,266 times.
> As far as distinct words go, 'oil' is middle of the road for
> occurences. As it is set up now, the best search time I am getting on
> this single word is roughly 22 seconds.
Does this time (22 seconds) is still better than seq. scan (no index)
or standard 'LIKE' ?
>
> Kris
>
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> >Kris,
> >
> >do you actually have only 508 disctinct words ? Could you try
> >more complex queries, say 2-3 words. Does these queries run faster ?
> >
> >
> > Oleg
> >On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Kris Kiger wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Regardless of caching, the queries are still taking 19~20 seconds to run
> >>on the 3,000,000 rows. I've played with performance tuning and nothing
> >>seems to make much of a difference. If I am reading that list from stat
> >>correctly, then I am operating on 508 distinct words. Is this the
> >>performance I should expect from tsearch2? Or is something still awry?
> >> I'm inclined to think something else is wrong, after reading some
> >>other people's tsearch performance stats. Thanks!
> >>
> >>Kris
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Regards,
> > Oleg
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83