Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Oleg Bartunov
Тема Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Дата
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.31.0101121706540.10200-100000@ra.sai.msu.su
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
Ответы Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Hannu Krosing wrote:

> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >
> > OK. We found an old implementation of R-Tre using GiST (Pg95)
> > and we'll try to implement regression test using R-Tree
> > it's anyway will be a good test.
>
> How is it different than using RD-tree for tests ?
>

No difference at all ! It's just another implemetation of R-Tree.

> Can you do it usin already compiled-in functions and modifying
>  things only at SQL level ?
>

unfortunately not ! Current postgres code has nothing connected with
GiST and this is a problem ! How to test interface code without
having two sides ? I understand we don't want to have another reason
for complaints about non-working regression test. I never got
regression test passed 100% on my Linux box with almost all versions
of PostgreSQL but I could live with that. What's wrong with
warning message if GiST test not passed ?

> Or is it just much simpler ?
>

I'm interesting to test performance of built-in R-Tree and R-Tree + GiST.
Oleg

> ---------------------
> Hannu
>
Regards,    Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !!
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AW: Re: tinterval - operator problems on AIX