RE: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
От
nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com
Тема
RE: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq
Дата
Msg-id
OSAPR01MB39403A338E95D4709EF3028096E20@OSAPR01MB3940.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Ответ на
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq (Michael Paquier)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
RE: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq "nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com" <nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
RE: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq "nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com" <nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: [patch]socket_timeout in interfaces/libpq David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Hi, Michael-san. > From: Michael Paquier > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 04:13:36AM +0000, nagaura.ryohei@fujitsu.com wrote: > > I don't think that the rest one of my proposals has been rejected > > completely, so I want to restart discussion. > I recall on the matter that there was consensus that nobody really liked this option > because it enforced a cancellation on the connection. It seems that you did not think so at that time. # Please refer to [1] I don't think all the reviewers are completely negative. I think some couldn't judge because lack of what kind of problem I was going to solve and the way to solve it, so I restarted to describe them in this time. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190406065428.GA2145%40paquier.xyz Best regards, --------------------- Ryohei Nagaura
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления