On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:38:21PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I recall having a negative impression on the patch when first looking
> at it, and still have the same impression when looking at the last
> version. Just with a quick look, assuming that you can bypass all
> cleanup operations normally taken by pqDropConnection() through a
> hijacking of pqWait() is not fine as this routine explicitely assumes
> to *never* have a timeout for its wait.
By the way, Fabien, you are marked as a reviewer of this patch since
the end of June. Are you planning to review it?
--
Michael