Michaël,
>> Not this round.
>
> You have registered yourself as a reviewer of this patch since the end
> of June. Could you please avoid that? Sometimes people skips patches
> when they see someone already registered to review it.
Yep. ISTM that I did a few reviews on early versions of the patch, which
was really a set of 3 patches.
> The patch applies cleanly so I am movingit to next CF.
>
> (FWIW, I still have the same impression as upthread, looking again at
> the patch, but let's see if there are other opinions.)
AFAICR, I was partly dissuated to pursue reviews by your comment that
somehow the feature had no clear consensus, so I thought that the patch
was implicitely rejected.
Although I work for free, I try to avoid working for nothing:-)
It is still unclear from your above comment whether the patch would ever
get committed, so this does not motivate spending time on it.
--
Fabien.