Re: revised hstore patch

On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Andrew Gierth wrote:

> To me (A) is looking like the obvious choice (the people smart enough
> to be using hstore-new from CVS already can handle the minor pain of
> updating the on-disk format).
>
> Unless I hear any objections I will proceed accordingly...

Yes, that seems like the smarter path to me, too, as long as the new  
format does not continue the bug, of course.

But should the "bug" be fixed in maintenance branches? I'm thinking,  
since its likelihood is so rare, probably not.

Best,

David