On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:23 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> This is really something that psycopg2 should work out for you. I
>> suggest you take up a discussion on this on their mailing list.
>
> ...which is down over the last 3 weeks or so:
>
> http://www.initd.org/
In addition, I posted a patch for 9.0 support which was supposed to be rolled in to psycopg2 weeks ago. Now I am stuck
pushingmy own psycopg2 egg around. The psycopg2 project is too reliant on one person (who has trouble managing his
servers)-I wish he would move the project to a public project management service.
I also remember a discussion on the poor state of postgresql drivers for python and which driver the PostgreSQL project
shouldendorse- it looks like the situation has not improved. Here's the thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00351.php
Cheers,
M