A.M. wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 12:23 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> This is really something that psycopg2 should work out for you. I
> >> suggest you take up a discussion on this on their mailing list.
> >
> > ...which is down over the last 3 weeks or so:
> >
> > http://www.initd.org/
>
> In addition, I posted a patch for 9.0 support which was supposed to be
> rolled in to psycopg2 weeks ago. Now I am stuck pushing my own psycopg2
> egg around. The psycopg2 project is too reliant on one person (who has
> trouble managing his servers)- I wish he would move the project to a
> public project management service.
>
> I also remember a discussion on the poor state of postgresql drivers
> for python and which driver the PostgreSQL project should endorse- it
> looks like the situation has not improved. Here's the thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00351.php
The python driver situation did improve, for a while. :-|
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +