RE: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема RE: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions
Дата
Msg-id ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGAEDGCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> You'll still need to VACUUM to get rid of the obsoleted versions of the
> row.  The point of the planned 7.2 changes is to make VACUUM cheap and
> nonintrusive enough so that you can run it frequently on tables that are
> seeing continual updates.

If it becomes non-intrusive, then why not have PostgreSQL run VACUUM
automatically when certain conditions (user-configurable, load, changes per
table, etc.) are met.

All the sys admin would need to do is put the VACCUUM FULL in a cron job.

Chris



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: ADD CONSTRAINT behaviour question
Следующее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions