Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions
От | Andrew G. Hammond |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E166iNA-0002ib-00@xyzzy.lan.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions (Roland Roberts <roland@astrofoto.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions
Re: PL/pgSQL examples NOT involving functions |
Список | pgsql-sql |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2001 November 19 09:42 am, Roland Roberts wrote: > >>>>> "Aasmund" == Aasmund Midttun Godal <postgresql@envisity.com> writes: > >> So I *could* create a pl/pgsql function and call it like that, > >> but since pl/pgsql procedures aren't compiled I wondered if I > >> could do it inline. > > Aasmund> I do believe they are compiled. > > Hmm, I'm going to have to look over the docs again. I missed that > change; I'm pretty sure that as of 6.2 there were *not* compiled and > that was clearly stated in the docs. You're right, they're interpreted at run time. If you want proof, just write a bogus function definition. It'll CREATE just fine, but barf with a syntax error when you try and execute it. - -- Andrew G. Hammond mailto:drew@xyzzy.dhs.org http://xyzzy.dhs.org/~drew/ 56 2A 54 EF 19 C0 3B 43 72 69 5B E3 69 5B A1 1F 613-389-5481 5CD3 62B0 254B DEB1 86E0 8959 093E F70A B457 84B1 "To blow recursion you must first blow recur" -- me -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjv8UFoACgkQCT73CrRXhLHSBwCeKEbDRUezLXS/Q1vP1VlXAdTD RVoAoI8qA8Q5C2hVdXwPGBt/3UnOKF4T =8+Us -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: