Re: [GENERAL] logical replication in PG10 BETA

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Igor Neyman
Тема Re: [GENERAL] logical replication in PG10 BETA
Дата
Msg-id DM5PR07MB281004134C3766018A10B957DAFE0@DM5PR07MB2810.namprd07.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] logical replication in PG10 BETA  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Список pgsql-general
-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:48 PM
To: Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] logical replication in PG10 BETA
On 05/23/2017 08:15 AM, Igor Neyman wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org 
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Klaver
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:04 AM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] logical replication in PG10 BETA
>
> On 05/23/2017 06:52 AM, Igor Neyman wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> sounds more like a SSL setup problem between the two Postgres servers, not really related to logical replication.
>>
>> Can you try to setup the connections without SSL?
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _
>> __________________________________
>>
>> That's what I thought when I first saw this error.
>> But, I don't understand why is it trying to use sockets.
>> I have ssl=off in postgresql.conf on both sides.
>
> AFAIK on Windows Postgres maps sockets to localhost.
>
> Anyway that was why I was asking about your pg_hba.conf and PUBLICATION and SUBSCRIPTION settings, to see what is
actuallybeing requested?
 
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Igor
>>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ___________________________________________
>
> Interestingly, when I add this line to pg_hba.conf:
>
> local    all             all           md5
>
> Postgres is not starting with the following error in the log file:
>
> 2017-05-23 11:02:10.397 EDT [4796] LOG:  local connections are not 
> supported by this build
> 2017-05-23 11:02:10.397 EDT [4796] CONTEXT:  line 1 of configuration file "C:/PostgreSQL/10/data/pg_hba.conf"
> 2017-05-23 11:02:10.398 EDT [4796] FATAL:  could not load pg_hba.conf
> 2017-05-23 11:02:10.403 EDT [4796] LOG:  database system is shut down
>
> The line I added is the first line.
> " LOG:  local connections are not supported by this build" - is this related to my problems with CREATE
SUBSCRIPTION?
>
> And another question:
> Anyone from 2ndQuadrant could verify that pglogical included in the core PG10 BETA (packed by EnterpriseDB) supports
Windows?

I think you are going to need to be more specific. I see pglogical as the extension provided by 2ndQuadrant and builtin
logicalas provided by the core server. If you are referring to the extension then see my post upstream where I
referencethe pglogical issue that addresses this at least partly.
 

>
> Regards,
> Igor
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
______________________________________________________________________________________________________

From the very beginning in this thread I was talking about logical replication built-in core server PG10 BETA, not
pglogicalextension.
 
Sorry, if I didn't make it clear.

Regards,
Igor

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: stevenchang1213
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Current best practice for maximum shared_bufferssettings on big hardware?
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Current best practice for maximum shared_bufferssettings on big hardware?