Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YH_+NPbmkGSqNbtwut2d-1a8Y5TNDA_gkMpTgsDL9Bx2A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On 11 Dec. 2016 06:50, "Petr Jelinek" <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 10/12/16 23:10, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
> The attached 0002-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch changes this
> behavior so that we don't make snapshots for transactions that we seen
> wholly and know that they didn't make catalog changes even if we didn't
> reach consistency yet.
>

Eh, attached wrong patch. This one is correct.

Attached no patch second time?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?
Следующее
От: Andrew Borodin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal