Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZRP_NTXKjZTJ956nzY8zgSXEeT-GBSYsHdhbqJbTHW1oQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> But I don't really think this is the right way to go about this.
> Research papers are going to turn up pretty specialized solutions that
> are probably patented. We don't even have the basic understanding we
> need. I suspect a basic textbook chapter on multistage sampling will
> discuss at least the standard techniques.

I agree that looking for information on block level sampling
specifically, and its impact on estimation quality is likely to not
turn up very much, and whatever it does turn up will have patent
issues.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good