Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ibrar Ahmed
Тема Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Дата
Msg-id CALtqXTcLnd+taZhecg0+65M8z0CJvuvotoQxuTMAeiMyRzQs0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types  (Peter Moser <pitiz29a@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi,
I have rebased the patch and currently reviewing the patch 
on master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012).




On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:45 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> I start looking at the patch, there is a couple of problems with the patch. The first one is the OID conflict, which I fixed on my machine. The second problem is assertion failure. I think you have not compiled the PostgreSQL code with the assertion.

Hi Peter,

Looks like there was some good feedback for this WIP project last time
around.  It's currently in "Needs Review" status in the July
Commitfest.  To encourage more review and see some automated compile
and test results, could we please have a fresh rebase?  The earlier
patches no longer apply.

Thanks,

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com


--
Ibrar Ahmed
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The unused_oids script should have a reminder to use the 8000-8999 OID range
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c