Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Munro
Тема Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Дата
Msg-id CA+hUKGL2UZSwdZRQ6O7sLXN_gWgr-_VaztBfj_GH+WCAWknMfg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types  (Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> I start looking at the patch, there is a couple of problems with the patch. The first one is the OID conflict, which
Ifixed on my machine. The second problem is assertion failure. I think you have not compiled the PostgreSQL code with
theassertion.
 

Hi Peter,

Looks like there was some good feedback for this WIP project last time
around.  It's currently in "Needs Review" status in the July
Commitfest.  To encourage more review and see some automated compile
and test results, could we please have a fresh rebase?  The earlier
patches no longer apply.

Thanks,

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensureclean shutdown)
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] get rid of StdRdOptions, use individual binary reloptionsrepresentation for each relation kind instead