Re: Will modifications to unlogged tables also be flused to disk?

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok thats really bad news :/
> After reading the discussion about calling unlogged tables "in memory"
> or "cached" I actually had high hopes pgql would take advantage of the
> fact that data of unlogged tables are not preserved at recovery.

Sorry, I could be misunderstanding here, but if the final aim is to
reduce the writes, why not tweaking wal settings and checkpoints? I
mean, is it possible to find a good solution or you need a kind of in
memory storage?

Luca