Re: executor relation handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: executor relation handling
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f9Hzp1Oog0e6wukNHNZMSqjPigW+Bw6HNUWU=AAFyL+Ow@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: executor relation handling  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: executor relation handling  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 28 September 2018 at 20:00, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I've made minor tweaks, which find in
> the attached updated patches (a .diff file containing changes from v6 to
> v7 is also attached).

Thanks for looking over the changes.

I've looked at the v6 to v7 diff and it seems all good, apart from:

+ * The following asserts that the necessary lock on the relation

I think we maybe should switch the word "assert" for "verifies". The
Assert is just checking we didn't get a NoLock and I don't think
you're using "assert" meaning the Assert() marco, so likely should be
changed to avoid confusion.

Apart from that, I see nothing wrong with the patches, so I think we
should get someone else to look. I'm marking it as ready for
committer.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: executor relation handling
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Removing LEFT JOINs in more cases