Re: executor relation handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: executor relation handling
Дата
Msg-id 949f8c8e-41e0-d633-216b-aa73dd8c38ed@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: executor relation handling  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: executor relation handling  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018/09/28 17:21, David Rowley wrote:
> On 28 September 2018 at 20:00, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I've made minor tweaks, which find in
>> the attached updated patches (a .diff file containing changes from v6 to
>> v7 is also attached).
> 
> Thanks for looking over the changes.
> 
> I've looked at the v6 to v7 diff and it seems all good, apart from:
> 
> + * The following asserts that the necessary lock on the relation
> 
> I think we maybe should switch the word "assert" for "verifies". The
> Assert is just checking we didn't get a NoLock and I don't think
> you're using "assert" meaning the Assert() marco, so likely should be
> changed to avoid confusion.

Okay, I've revised the text in the attached updated patch.

> Apart from that, I see nothing wrong with the patches, so I think we
> should get someone else to look. I'm marking it as ready for
> committer.

Thanks for your time reviewing the patches.

Regards,
Amit

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Removing LEFT JOINs in more cases
Следующее
От: "Yamaji, Ryo"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization