Hi David,
> It's basically a glorified cross-reference. I didn't dislike directing the reader to the internals section enough to
tryand establish a better location for the main content.
One problem I see is that:
+ [..], but as there is no pre-existing data, visibility checks are unnecessary.
... allows a wide variety of interpretations, most of which will be
wrong. And all in all I find an added paragraph somewhat cryptic.
If the goal is to add a cross-reference I suggest keeping it short,
something like "For additional details on various corner cases please
see ...".
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev