On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:18 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 24, 2022 4:38 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
> >
...
> > 5. src/include/catalog/pg_publication.h - typedef struct PublicationDesc
> >
> > +typedef struct PublicationDesc
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * true if the columns referenced in row filters which are used for
> > +UPDATE
> > + * or DELETE are part of the replica identity, or the publication
> > +actions
> > + * do not include UPDATE or DELETE.
> > + */
> > + bool rf_valid_for_update;
> > + bool rf_valid_for_delete;
> > +
> > + AttrNumber invalid_rfcol_update;
> > + AttrNumber invalid_rfcol_delete;
> > +
> > + PublicationActions pubactions;
> > +} PublicationDesc;
> > +
> >
> > I did not see any point really for the pairs of booleans and AttNumbers.
> > AFAIK both of them shared exactly the same validation logic so I think you can
> > get by using fewer members here.
>
> the pairs of booleans are intended to fix the problem[2] reported earlier.
> [2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS0PR01MB611367BB85115707CDB2F40CFB5A9%40OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
> >
OK. Thanks for the info.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia