Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzmsg4GWcNzUWqO6v8XmuHcznBR2q32wQLqnSzMKcP2onw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench  (Alik Khilazhev <a.khilazhev@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I'd be interested in seeing the difference it makes if Postgres is
> built with the call to _bt_check_unique() commented out within
> nbtinsert.c.

Actually, I mean that I wonder how much of a difference it would make
if this entire block was commented out within _bt_doinsert():

if (checkUnique != UNIQUE_CHECK_NO)
{   ...
}


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Causal reads take II