Re: (Repeat.) Please give pgAdmin 4 its own GUI. The constantpassword inputs are driving me insane...

Have you tried using more than one browser?
that's what I've taken to doing, I have a separate install of Chromium just for pgAdmin4.  I've even changed the browser command to 
Load pgAdmin and/or a small number of secured things you want to stay logged in
for longer periods, while do your majority of activities or the ones you'd want
to clear your browser for in others.

I for example have Safari plus Firefox plus Chrome and compartmentalize my
activity between them, and they're all mutually isolated.

-- Darren Duncan

On 2019-07-27 5:54 a.m., tutiluren@tutanota.com wrote:
> Sorry for repeating this, but the only replies I got were unrelated to what I
> typed, instead briefly discussing master passwords.
>
>     Every single day, even after getting rid of the "master password" nonsense
>     (which was a nightmare in itself), pgAdmin keeps asking me, again and again,
>     to enter the password when I try to connect to my servers. This is cleared
>     every single time I clear my browser data, which is an absolute necessity
>     multiple times a day.
>
>     I don't want pgAdmin to have anything to do with my browser, and dealing
>     with multiple "profiles" is very impractical and tedious to set up. I don't
>     want them connected whatsoever. Please make a proper GUI that is entirely
>     separate from your "normal browser", allowing it to remember passwords and
>     not constantly forget them because it's attached to your normal browser's data.
>
>     The GUI can be an embedded browser and has no need whatsoever for constant
>     security updates because all it does is load pgAdmin 4's code. It doesn't
>     need to be able to do anything else, nor should it be able to. It shouldn't
>     even be apparent to the user that it's a browser at all -- it should just
>     open a GUI window with pgAdmin 4 inside of it -- not rely on my browser
>     environment.
>
>     I almost recall that this actually was done in the past. Why you would
>     abandon this idea is inexplicable to me, since "just using the normal
>     browser" causes so many annoying problems.
>
>