Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpRdY5q1HG1N4eyrZxHYji4HS1X4TAGDEKUQXv9h3YomcrQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/01/03 15:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>
>> The patch looks good to me, but I feel there are too many testscases.
>> Now that we have changed the approach to invalidate caches in all
>> cases, should we just include cases for SELECT or UPDATE or INSERT or
>> DELETE instead of each statement?
>
>
> I don't object to that, but (1) the tests I added wouldn't be that
> time-consuming, and (2) they would be more expected to help find bugs, in
> general, so I'd vote for keeping them.  How about leaving that for the
> committer's judge?
>

Ok. Marking this as ready for committer.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Odd behavior with PG_TRY
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files