Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Etsuro Fujita
Тема Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.
Дата
Msg-id 0783339c-0f6e-7d80-7704-603e65711d01@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidatingprepare statement execution plan.  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw : altering foreign table not invalidating prepare statement execution plan.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017/01/06 21:25, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2017/01/03 15:57, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>> The patch looks good to me, but I feel there are too many testscases.
>>> Now that we have changed the approach to invalidate caches in all
>>> cases, should we just include cases for SELECT or UPDATE or INSERT or
>>> DELETE instead of each statement?

>> I don't object to that, but (1) the tests I added wouldn't be that
>> time-consuming, and (2) they would be more expected to help find bugs, in
>> general, so I'd vote for keeping them.  How about leaving that for the
>> committer's judge?

> Ok. Marking this as ready for committer.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Support for pg_receivexlog --post-segment command
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6