Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRAu0R9A1zX7RkS+tronMCw6EL=OOZ5bRJjO6ujRHeuWzw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: psql metaqueries with \gexec  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
 

FWIW, I also wish we had something better than format() for this stuff. I did create [1] towards that end, but it currently depends on some C code, which is cumbersome.

For the most party, I'm pretty thrilled with format(), though:
- I'll admit to being grumpy about the %1$s notation, but I have no better suggestion. 
- I'd also like it if there were a %I variant that accepted schema qualified names and %I-ed both, though I see the inability to tell the difference between a schema dot and a really-named-that dot.
- I'd love it if there were a %C format that took a pg_class oid and formatted the qualified schema name. As it is i just use %s and cast the parameter as ::regclass

The design of the "format" function is not closed. Try to send prototype and patch. The possibility to do PostgreSQL customization was strong reason why we didn't implemented "sprintf" and we implemented "format".

Regards

Pavel
 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christoph Berg
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Relaxing SSL key permission checks
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode